<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75603</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be upheld until the fresh assessment was completed. The Court emphasized that concealment could not be established without final adjudication on the income addition issue. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to initiate penalty proceedings in a fresh assessment after the limitation period had expired was deemed legally unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75603</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be upheld until the fresh assessment was completed. The Court emphasized that concealment could not be established without final adjudication on the income addition issue. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to initiate penalty proceedings in a fresh assessment after the limitation period had expired was deemed legally unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>