<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 505 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75596</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the necessity of allowing depreciation in best judgment assessments and directed Tribunals to adhere to correct legal principles without adopting inapplicable sections like 44AD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 505 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75596</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the necessity of allowing depreciation in best judgment assessments and directed Tribunals to adhere to correct legal principles without adopting inapplicable sections like 44AD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>