<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 566 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75595</link>
    <description>The court upheld the disallowance of deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I by the Assessing Officer, ruling that the issue was not debatable at the time of filing the return despite a previous court judgment. The Assessing Officer was deemed justified in making additions under section 143(1)(a), leading to the dismissal of both appeals in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 566 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75595</link>
      <description>The court upheld the disallowance of deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I by the Assessing Officer, ruling that the issue was not debatable at the time of filing the return despite a previous court judgment. The Assessing Officer was deemed justified in making additions under section 143(1)(a), leading to the dismissal of both appeals in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>