https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75590 The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals before it, ranging from four to twenty-three days, due to compelling official pre-occupations faced by the Department. Emphasizing the authority granted to the Committee of Commissioners under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal held that the authorization to file appeals without a specified time frame was sufficient. It exercised its discretion to condone the delays, stating that such authorization served the public interest. The Tribunal directed the Registry to proceed with the Stay petitions/appeals, listing the matter for disposal. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75590 The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals before it, ranging from four to twenty-three days, due to compelling official pre-occupations faced by the Department. Emphasizing the authority granted to the Committee of Commissioners under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal held that the authorization to file appeals without a specified time frame was sufficient. It exercised its discretion to condone the delays, stating that such authorization served the public interest. The Tribunal directed the Registry to proceed with the Stay petitions/appeals, listing the matter for disposal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75590