<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 451 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the respondents&#039; ignorance of statutory requirements. It reinstated the demand for interest for delayed payment of service tax, finding the respondents liable for interest payment as per Section 75 of the Act. The appeals were partially allowed, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to vacate the demand for penalties but reinstating the demand for interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 451 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the respondents&#039; ignorance of statutory requirements. It reinstated the demand for interest for delayed payment of service tax, finding the respondents liable for interest payment as per Section 75 of the Act. The appeals were partially allowed, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to vacate the demand for penalties but reinstating the demand for interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>