<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 347 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75580</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 76 is not warranted where non-payment of service tax arose from a bona fide belief that no liability existed and there was no wilful intent to evade tax. The assessee, a cooperative society of ex-servicemen, relied on the prevailing view and advice that only a commercial concern was liable during the relevant period. The record showed no deliberate suppression or evasion, and the discretionary setting aside of penalties was upheld as free from infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 347 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75580</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 76 is not warranted where non-payment of service tax arose from a bona fide belief that no liability existed and there was no wilful intent to evade tax. The assessee, a cooperative society of ex-servicemen, relied on the prevailing view and advice that only a commercial concern was liable during the relevant period. The record showed no deliberate suppression or evasion, and the discretionary setting aside of penalties was upheld as free from infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>