<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied CENVAT credit for garden maintenance services but allowed credit for outdoor catering based on a Larger Bench decision. Regarding security services for the Director, credit was denied due to lack of evidence and absence of a relevant agreement. The Tribunal granted waiver and stay of recovery for a portion of the denied credit amount, with a requirement to deposit the remaining sum within a specified period to avoid penalties. Compliance with this directive would result in a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 449 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied CENVAT credit for garden maintenance services but allowed credit for outdoor catering based on a Larger Bench decision. Regarding security services for the Director, credit was denied due to lack of evidence and absence of a relevant agreement. The Tribunal granted waiver and stay of recovery for a portion of the denied credit amount, with a requirement to deposit the remaining sum within a specified period to avoid penalties. Compliance with this directive would result in a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>