<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 346 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75577</link>
    <description>Transportation through the pipeline was treated as a technological necessity integral to the assessee&#039;s storage and warehousing business, because mixed movement of petroleum products in the prescribed sequence was required for pipeline operation. On that prima facie basis, the transport of other oil companies&#039; goods was considered connected with the assessee&#039;s business activity and capable of qualifying as input service for the output service. The assessee therefore established a strong prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, penalty and interest, and interim relief was granted without deciding the final tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 346 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75577</link>
      <description>Transportation through the pipeline was treated as a technological necessity integral to the assessee&#039;s storage and warehousing business, because mixed movement of petroleum products in the prescribed sequence was required for pipeline operation. On that prima facie basis, the transport of other oil companies&#039; goods was considered connected with the assessee&#039;s business activity and capable of qualifying as input service for the output service. The assessee therefore established a strong prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, penalty and interest, and interim relief was granted without deciding the final tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>