<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 412 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by setting aside the penalty under Section 78 and reducing the penalty under Section 76 for a case involving liability for service tax on &#039;Cleaning Services&#039;. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 73(3) was rejected, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 412 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by setting aside the penalty under Section 78 and reducing the penalty under Section 76 for a case involving liability for service tax on &#039;Cleaning Services&#039;. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 73(3) was rejected, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>