<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 345 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75567</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the service tax liability for club and association services, finding that the amount collected for plots unrelated to normal services should not be included in the tax calculation. For health club and fitness center services, the tribunal ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs within three months, with the remaining balance waived until the appeal&#039;s resolution, acknowledging the complexity of the issue. Compliance was required by a specified date in August 2009. The judgment demonstrates a thorough analysis of legal provisions and factual circumstances, considering the intricacies of the appellant&#039;s arguments and the challenges in determining the correctness of the tax demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 345 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75567</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the service tax liability for club and association services, finding that the amount collected for plots unrelated to normal services should not be included in the tax calculation. For health club and fitness center services, the tribunal ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs within three months, with the remaining balance waived until the appeal&#039;s resolution, acknowledging the complexity of the issue. Compliance was required by a specified date in August 2009. The judgment demonstrates a thorough analysis of legal provisions and factual circumstances, considering the intricacies of the appellant&#039;s arguments and the challenges in determining the correctness of the tax demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>