https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75564 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo adjudication due to the inadequacy of the impugned order. The appellant, M/s. Venpakal Advertisers Trivendraum, contested their liability for service tax under advertising agency services, emphasizing a lack of examination of key points in the original order. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide detailed findings on the contentions within three months for a fair resolution, disposing of the appeal for further review and decision-making. en-us Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75564 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo adjudication due to the inadequacy of the impugned order. The appellant, M/s. Venpakal Advertisers Trivendraum, contested their liability for service tax under advertising agency services, emphasizing a lack of examination of key points in the original order. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to provide detailed findings on the contentions within three months for a fair resolution, disposing of the appeal for further review and decision-making. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75564