<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75542</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, directed the applicants to pre-deposit Rs. 75,000 towards a penalty of Rs. 2,53,041 for delayed service tax payment and Rs. 3,000 for late filing of returns. The Tribunal found no prima facie case for an unconditional waiver of the penalty, as the claimed exemptions were limited and the penalty was imposed for late filing and payment. Failure to comply with the pre-deposit within four weeks would result in the appeal&#039;s dismissal. Compliance deadline was set for 17-7-2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75542</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, directed the applicants to pre-deposit Rs. 75,000 towards a penalty of Rs. 2,53,041 for delayed service tax payment and Rs. 3,000 for late filing of returns. The Tribunal found no prima facie case for an unconditional waiver of the penalty, as the claimed exemptions were limited and the penalty was imposed for late filing and payment. Failure to comply with the pre-deposit within four weeks would result in the appeal&#039;s dismissal. Compliance deadline was set for 17-7-2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>