<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 428 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75539</link>
    <description>In a service tax appeal, the tribunal considered whether the appellant should obtain waiver of pre-deposit of the balance demand pending disposal of the appeal. Taking note of the amount already deposited, it directed that the remaining demand would stay waived during the pendency of the appeal as an interim measure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 428 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75539</link>
      <description>In a service tax appeal, the tribunal considered whether the appellant should obtain waiver of pre-deposit of the balance demand pending disposal of the appeal. Taking note of the amount already deposited, it directed that the remaining demand would stay waived during the pendency of the appeal as an interim measure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>