<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 260 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75521</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, stayed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and decided the appeals. The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay tax before Section 66A was in effect, setting aside the order for refund recovery of input service tax. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 260 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75521</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, stayed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and decided the appeals. The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay tax before Section 66A was in effect, setting aside the order for refund recovery of input service tax. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeals were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>