https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75520 In a service tax dispute involving tour operators and contract carriages, CESTAT Bangalore dispensed with the entire pre-deposit of tax, interest and penalty because the issue was stated in a Board communication to be under examination and adjudication matters were to be kept in abeyance. The Tribunal treated the administrative pendency as sufficient to justify interim relief and also protected the appellants from coercive recovery while the appeal remained pending. en-us Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75520 In a service tax dispute involving tour operators and contract carriages, CESTAT Bangalore dispensed with the entire pre-deposit of tax, interest and penalty because the issue was stated in a Board communication to be under examination and adjudication matters were to be kept in abeyance. The Tribunal treated the administrative pendency as sufficient to justify interim relief and also protected the appellants from coercive recovery while the appeal remained pending. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75520