<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 399 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75480</link>
    <description>Free supply of set-top boxes without transfer of ownership was treated as outside the concept of sale, so the retail sale price framework under the packaged commodities regime did not apply. On that basis, Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable, and valuation for additional customs duty had to be made under Section 4 instead. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 399 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75480</link>
      <description>Free supply of set-top boxes without transfer of ownership was treated as outside the concept of sale, so the retail sale price framework under the packaged commodities regime did not apply. On that basis, Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was held inapplicable, and valuation for additional customs duty had to be made under Section 4 instead. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>