<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 111 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75453</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order directing deposit of duty amount, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to higher court judgments. The petitioners successfully argued that they were entitled to avail Cenvat Credit for job work, as established in precedents like Sterlite Industries. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not following established law and directed the petitioners to provide a bond instead of making a pre-deposit, highlighting the need for consistency in legal interpretation to prevent judicial chaos.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 111 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75453</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order directing deposit of duty amount, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to higher court judgments. The petitioners successfully argued that they were entitled to avail Cenvat Credit for job work, as established in precedents like Sterlite Industries. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not following established law and directed the petitioners to provide a bond instead of making a pre-deposit, highlighting the need for consistency in legal interpretation to prevent judicial chaos.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>