https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75451 The case involved a dispute over the denial of credit for duty paid on adhesive tapes used in manufacturing exempted goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that the adhesive tapes were not used in the job-work goods cleared in wet condition, as supported by statutory documents. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of investigation at the principal manufacturer's end regarding the adhesive tapes' usage, leading to the setting aside of the denial order and allowing the appeal. This case underscores the significance of thorough investigation and consideration of evidence in similar matters. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75451 The case involved a dispute over the denial of credit for duty paid on adhesive tapes used in manufacturing exempted goods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that the adhesive tapes were not used in the job-work goods cleared in wet condition, as supported by statutory documents. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of investigation at the principal manufacturer's end regarding the adhesive tapes' usage, leading to the setting aside of the denial order and allowing the appeal. This case underscores the significance of thorough investigation and consideration of evidence in similar matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75451