https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75443 The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the conditions set by the Commissioner of Customs for the provisional release of the seized goods. It found the imposed conditions reasonable given the scale of the customs duty evasion scam. The court determined that there was insufficient evidence to establish ownership of the goods by one of the parties and ordered each petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 5,000/- to the respondents within four weeks. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75443 The court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the conditions set by the Commissioner of Customs for the provisional release of the seized goods. It found the imposed conditions reasonable given the scale of the customs duty evasion scam. The court determined that there was insufficient evidence to establish ownership of the goods by one of the parties and ordered each petitioner to pay costs of Rs. 5,000/- to the respondents within four weeks. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75443