https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75428 Writ interference with a Tribunal's partial waiver of pre-deposit was declined because the Tribunal's prima facie view on liability was not shown to be erroneous. The dispute arose from imports of crude palm oil at a concessional customs duty rate, where the investigation suggested the goods were not used in manufacture and the concession may have been misused. The petitioner's claim of financial inability did not justify complete waiver in writ jurisdiction, so the direction to deposit Rs. 80 lakhs for hearing the appeal on merits was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75428 Writ interference with a Tribunal's partial waiver of pre-deposit was declined because the Tribunal's prima facie view on liability was not shown to be erroneous. The dispute arose from imports of crude palm oil at a concessional customs duty rate, where the investigation suggested the goods were not used in manufacture and the concession may have been misused. The petitioner's claim of financial inability did not justify complete waiver in writ jurisdiction, so the direction to deposit Rs. 80 lakhs for hearing the appeal on merits was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75428