<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75422</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying exemption for interest income of the appellant club based on the principles of mutuality. However, the Court remitted the issue of miscellaneous income back to the Tribunal for reconsideration in line with a Supreme Court ruling, providing guidance on the tax treatment of such income for mutual concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75422</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, denying exemption for interest income of the appellant club based on the principles of mutuality. However, the Court remitted the issue of miscellaneous income back to the Tribunal for reconsideration in line with a Supreme Court ruling, providing guidance on the tax treatment of such income for mutual concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>