<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75417</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that the appeal lacked a substantial question of law and emphasized the importance of raising relevant arguments before the appropriate authorities. The decision was based on precedents from other High Courts and the failure to present a valid question of law for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 101 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75417</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court held that the appeal lacked a substantial question of law and emphasized the importance of raising relevant arguments before the appropriate authorities. The decision was based on precedents from other High Courts and the failure to present a valid question of law for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>