<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 97 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75413</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of specific and valid purposes for income accumulation under Section 11(2). The Court highlighted the importance of complying with previous related cases, remitting the matter back to the assessing officer for further consideration, based on the need for clear specification of the purpose for accumulation in Form 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 97 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75413</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of specific and valid purposes for income accumulation under Section 11(2). The Court highlighted the importance of complying with previous related cases, remitting the matter back to the assessing officer for further consideration, based on the need for clear specification of the purpose for accumulation in Form 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>