<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 331 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75399</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for interest deduction on amounts borrowed for purchasing shares, upholding the assessing authority and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court found that the specific provisions of the Income-tax Act, including sections 10(33) and 14A, did not allow for the claimed deduction. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a Supreme Court decision, the court held that the cited case law was inapplicable due to legislative changes. The court also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of a hearing opportunity before the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s justification based on the current legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 331 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75399</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for interest deduction on amounts borrowed for purchasing shares, upholding the assessing authority and Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court found that the specific provisions of the Income-tax Act, including sections 10(33) and 14A, did not allow for the claimed deduction. Despite the appellant&#039;s reliance on a Supreme Court decision, the court held that the cited case law was inapplicable due to legislative changes. The court also rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the lack of a hearing opportunity before the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s justification based on the current legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>