<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 375 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75380</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the inclusion of reimbursable expenses in the gross value for service tax liability was incorrect. The appellant&#039;s argument for deduction of such expenses was supported by previous tribunal decisions exempting certain reimbursable expenses from service tax. The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s case fell within the scope of these exemptions, concluding that the impugned order upholding the inclusion of reimbursable expenses was legally unsustainable. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 375 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75380</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the inclusion of reimbursable expenses in the gross value for service tax liability was incorrect. The appellant&#039;s argument for deduction of such expenses was supported by previous tribunal decisions exempting certain reimbursable expenses from service tax. The tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s case fell within the scope of these exemptions, concluding that the impugned order upholding the inclusion of reimbursable expenses was legally unsustainable. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>