<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 336 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the sale of the Betalactum Division constituted a slump sale, not a sale of block of assets, under sections 50 and 50A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the sale of a going concern, even with retained assets, did not fall under sections 50 and 50A. The appellant&#039;s claim of long-term capital loss was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s argument for taxing the excess sale consideration as short-term capital gain. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 336 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the sale of the Betalactum Division constituted a slump sale, not a sale of block of assets, under sections 50 and 50A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the sale of a going concern, even with retained assets, did not fall under sections 50 and 50A. The appellant&#039;s claim of long-term capital loss was upheld, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s argument for taxing the excess sale consideration as short-term capital gain. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>