<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 234 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75366</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant a fresh opportunity to the assessee, an educational institution, without providing reasons was found to lack justification. Emphasizing the need for the Tribunal to give reasons for its decisions and consider all relevant facts and laws, the judgment favored the Revenue, directing a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 234 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75366</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed, and the case was remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant a fresh opportunity to the assessee, an educational institution, without providing reasons was found to lack justification. Emphasizing the need for the Tribunal to give reasons for its decisions and consider all relevant facts and laws, the judgment favored the Revenue, directing a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>