<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 544 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75363</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by setting aside all previous orders and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a finding on whether the exported granite was raw or polished. This determination was deemed crucial for assessing the assessee&#039;s eligibility for benefits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 544 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75363</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by setting aside all previous orders and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a finding on whether the exported granite was raw or polished. This determination was deemed crucial for assessing the assessee&#039;s eligibility for benefits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>