<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 476 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75362</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the respondent to make a fresh decision within one month in accordance with the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of not overly emphasizing technicalities when the essence of the provision is fulfilled, focusing on substantial compliance with the statutory requirements under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 476 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75362</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the respondent to make a fresh decision within one month in accordance with the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of not overly emphasizing technicalities when the essence of the provision is fulfilled, focusing on substantial compliance with the statutory requirements under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>