https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75359 CESTAT Mumbai held that a stay-stage appeal was not fit for remand without compliance with pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The majority and Third Member found that alleged denial of natural justice, including non-supply of documents, rejection of Chartered Engineers' reports, and refusal of cross-examination, did not justify remand on the facts recorded. The controversy was directed to be dealt with within the stay applications, and the appellants were required to make the prescribed pre-deposits. The Member (Judicial) dissented and favoured remand without pre-deposit. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75359 CESTAT Mumbai held that a stay-stage appeal was not fit for remand without compliance with pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. The majority and Third Member found that alleged denial of natural justice, including non-supply of documents, rejection of Chartered Engineers' reports, and refusal of cross-examination, did not justify remand on the facts recorded. The controversy was directed to be dealt with within the stay applications, and the appellants were required to make the prescribed pre-deposits. The Member (Judicial) dissented and favoured remand without pre-deposit. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75359