https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75355 The High Court held that the appellant had locus standi and was a "person aggrieved" under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal's misinterpretation of legal precedents and failure to follow the remand order led to the High Court setting aside the tribunal's decision. The appellant, who suffered financial loss due to the excise duty demand, was deemed qualified to file the appeal. The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to proceed with the appeal against the Revenue. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75355 The High Court held that the appellant had locus standi and was a "person aggrieved" under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal's misinterpretation of legal precedents and failure to follow the remand order led to the High Court setting aside the tribunal's decision. The appellant, who suffered financial loss due to the excise duty demand, was deemed qualified to file the appeal. The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to proceed with the appeal against the Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75355