<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties against the drivers for knowingly transporting smuggled goods but set aside the penalty for the cleaner due to lack of evidence. The owner was held liable despite denying involvement, with penalties reduced for all parties based on their financial status. Penalties for the drivers were reduced from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 20,000 each, and the owner&#039;s penalty was reduced from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties against the drivers for knowingly transporting smuggled goods but set aside the penalty for the cleaner due to lack of evidence. The owner was held liable despite denying involvement, with penalties reduced for all parties based on their financial status. Penalties for the drivers were reduced from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 20,000 each, and the owner&#039;s penalty was reduced from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>