<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 148 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75332</link>
    <description>Area-specific or industry-specific exemption notifications issued for developmental purposes do not, by themselves, infringe the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The Court accepted that the Central Government has power to grant such exemptions, and rejected the challenge based on alleged discrimination between manufacturers in neighbouring States and the petitioners. The notifications were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 148 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75332</link>
      <description>Area-specific or industry-specific exemption notifications issued for developmental purposes do not, by themselves, infringe the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The Court accepted that the Central Government has power to grant such exemptions, and rejected the challenge based on alleged discrimination between manufacturers in neighbouring States and the petitioners. The notifications were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>