<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 443 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders, allowing the appeals primarily due to revenue neutrality regarding CENVAT credit. The demand for duty and interest was upheld within the normal limitation period, with penalties being waived in all instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 443 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders, allowing the appeals primarily due to revenue neutrality regarding CENVAT credit. The demand for duty and interest was upheld within the normal limitation period, with penalties being waived in all instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>