<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 144 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) retained the power to remand even after the amendment to Rule 35A of the Central Excise Rules. Despite precedents indicating otherwise, the Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority&#039;s application of incorrect rules warranted a remand for a fresh decision. Relying on legal authorities, including a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal concluded that the remand annulled the decision under appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the appellate authority&#039;s discretion to confirm, modify, or annul decisions as deemed appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 144 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) retained the power to remand even after the amendment to Rule 35A of the Central Excise Rules. Despite precedents indicating otherwise, the Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority&#039;s application of incorrect rules warranted a remand for a fresh decision. Relying on legal authorities, including a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal concluded that the remand annulled the decision under appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the appellate authority&#039;s discretion to confirm, modify, or annul decisions as deemed appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>