<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 332 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75311</link>
    <description>Credit of Additional Duty of Customs paid on import was accepted where the importer produced a certificate from the Appraising Officer proving payment, even though the bill of entry had not originally reflected assessment of that duty. The decisive point was that the duty was in fact subsequently charged and paid, and the certificate was treated as sufficient evidence of payment when no other practical means was available to establish the claim. On those facts, entitlement to credit was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 332 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75311</link>
      <description>Credit of Additional Duty of Customs paid on import was accepted where the importer produced a certificate from the Appraising Officer proving payment, even though the bill of entry had not originally reflected assessment of that duty. The decisive point was that the duty was in fact subsequently charged and paid, and the certificate was treated as sufficient evidence of payment when no other practical means was available to establish the claim. On those facts, entitlement to credit was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>