<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 331 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75310</link>
    <description>A modification application seeking alteration of an earlier pre-deposit direction was held not maintainable on the facts stated, and the plea of financial hardship did not warrant interference with the existing order. The application was rejected, but time for compliance with the pre-deposit direction was extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 331 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75310</link>
      <description>A modification application seeking alteration of an earlier pre-deposit direction was held not maintainable on the facts stated, and the plea of financial hardship did not warrant interference with the existing order. The application was rejected, but time for compliance with the pre-deposit direction was extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>