<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 321 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75309</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that interconnection charges paid by telecom companies for port access/network interconnection do not constitute &quot;technical services&quot; under section 194J of the Income Tax Act, thus not subject to TDS. Applying the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, the court interpreted &quot;technical services&quot; alongside &quot;managerial&quot; and &quot;consultancy&quot; services as requiring human element/interface. Since interconnection facilities are provided automatically by machines without human involvement, they cannot be classified as technical services. The facility constitutes use of standard infrastructure rather than human-rendered technical assistance. Appeals by Revenue dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 321 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75309</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that interconnection charges paid by telecom companies for port access/network interconnection do not constitute &quot;technical services&quot; under section 194J of the Income Tax Act, thus not subject to TDS. Applying the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, the court interpreted &quot;technical services&quot; alongside &quot;managerial&quot; and &quot;consultancy&quot; services as requiring human element/interface. Since interconnection facilities are provided automatically by machines without human involvement, they cannot be classified as technical services. The facility constitutes use of standard infrastructure rather than human-rendered technical assistance. Appeals by Revenue dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>