<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75270</link>
    <description>An appeal was treated as not maintainable where the appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and no stay application seeking waiver was on record. The Tribunal also noted that the copy of the show cause notice had not been filed, making the appeal defective. On these facts, the objection to maintainability was accepted and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75270</link>
      <description>An appeal was treated as not maintainable where the appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and no stay application seeking waiver was on record. The Tribunal also noted that the copy of the show cause notice had not been filed, making the appeal defective. On these facts, the objection to maintainability was accepted and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>