https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75269 A petition challenging dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order was found not maintainable where the Tribunal had directed deposit of 30% of the penalty within the stipulated time and warned of dismissal on default. The petitioner did not comply and had stated that it was neither capable of nor intended to comply with the direction. In those circumstances, invoking the Court's extraordinary jurisdiction to question the consequential dismissal was treated as an abuse of process, and the petition was not entertained. en-us Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75269 A petition challenging dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit order was found not maintainable where the Tribunal had directed deposit of 30% of the penalty within the stipulated time and warned of dismissal on default. The petitioner did not comply and had stated that it was neither capable of nor intended to comply with the direction. In those circumstances, invoking the Court's extraordinary jurisdiction to question the consequential dismissal was treated as an abuse of process, and the petition was not entertained. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75269