https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75256 The Court upheld the Central Information Commission's order directing the disclosure of marks and annual confidential reports under the Right to Information Act, 2005. It emphasized the petitioner's obligation to act fairly in considering candidates for promotion, in line with constitutional principles. The Court ruled that the information requested was not personal but essential for fair promotion consideration, dismissing the petitioner's arguments against disclosure. The judgment affirmed the Commission's decision as valid and necessary for ensuring transparency and fairness in the promotion process. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75256 The Court upheld the Central Information Commission's order directing the disclosure of marks and annual confidential reports under the Right to Information Act, 2005. It emphasized the petitioner's obligation to act fairly in considering candidates for promotion, in line with constitutional principles. The Court ruled that the information requested was not personal but essential for fair promotion consideration, dismissing the petitioner's arguments against disclosure. The judgment affirmed the Commission's decision as valid and necessary for ensuring transparency and fairness in the promotion process. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75256