https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75238 The appeal was disposed of with a directive to promptly implement the Tribunal's order dated 11-3-2005, emphasizing coordination between Customs authorities and the resolution of procedural hurdles within six months. The Tribunal ruled that both Customs Houses must work together, with the port of import calculating the drawback and the New Customs House handling the set-off, overcoming objections regarding the authority for quantifying drawback. The department was instructed to comply with the Tribunal's order without reservation, underscoring the obligation to adhere to the decision. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75238 The appeal was disposed of with a directive to promptly implement the Tribunal's order dated 11-3-2005, emphasizing coordination between Customs authorities and the resolution of procedural hurdles within six months. The Tribunal ruled that both Customs Houses must work together, with the port of import calculating the drawback and the New Customs House handling the set-off, overcoming objections regarding the authority for quantifying drawback. The department was instructed to comply with the Tribunal's order without reservation, underscoring the obligation to adhere to the decision. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75238