<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 184 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. It was concluded that no interest was required to be paid, leading to the decision that the rebate claim should be refunded instead of being adjusted against the interest amount. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of Section 11AB and the judgment of the Larger Bench regarding interest payment from the Modvat credit account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 184 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. It was concluded that no interest was required to be paid, leading to the decision that the rebate claim should be refunded instead of being adjusted against the interest amount. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of Section 11AB and the judgment of the Larger Bench regarding interest payment from the Modvat credit account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>