<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 268 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application due to the appellant&#039;s failure to establish sufficient cause for the 1042-day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s claim of not receiving the Order-in-Original due to it being pasted at the factory gate was rejected, as the Tribunal found the appellant had control over the premises until it was sealed for non-payment of dues. Consequently, the appeal and stay application were rejected, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility to ensure receipt of official communications despite factory attachment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 268 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application due to the appellant&#039;s failure to establish sufficient cause for the 1042-day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s claim of not receiving the Order-in-Original due to it being pasted at the factory gate was rejected, as the Tribunal found the appellant had control over the premises until it was sealed for non-payment of dues. Consequently, the appeal and stay application were rejected, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility to ensure receipt of official communications despite factory attachment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>