<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 464 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75207</link>
    <description>The court held that the appellant is a &#039;public authority&#039; under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, as it was found to be both controlled and substantially financed by the government. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the judgment of the writ court, and the appellant was directed to provide the requested information in accordance with the RTI Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 464 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75207</link>
      <description>The court held that the appellant is a &#039;public authority&#039; under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, as it was found to be both controlled and substantially financed by the government. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the judgment of the writ court, and the appellant was directed to provide the requested information in accordance with the RTI Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>