<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 283 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal, setting aside penalties imposed, and partially allowed the Shipping Line&#039;s appeal, modifying the Commissioner&#039;s order. Emphasis was placed on legal compliance in export procedures and the liabilities of parties involved under the Customs Act, 1962. The redemption fine imposed on the exporter was set aside as the goods were not physically available for confiscation. Penalties on the exporter were overturned due to no deliberate defiance, while penalties on the Shipping Line were reduced but upheld for knowingly violating procedures. Compliance with export regulations and responsibilities of Shipping Lines were highlighted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 283 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal, setting aside penalties imposed, and partially allowed the Shipping Line&#039;s appeal, modifying the Commissioner&#039;s order. Emphasis was placed on legal compliance in export procedures and the liabilities of parties involved under the Customs Act, 1962. The redemption fine imposed on the exporter was set aside as the goods were not physically available for confiscation. Penalties on the exporter were overturned due to no deliberate defiance, while penalties on the Shipping Line were reduced but upheld for knowingly violating procedures. Compliance with export regulations and responsibilities of Shipping Lines were highlighted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>