https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75201 The appeal succeeded as the Tribunal found no justification to deviate from a prior decision ruling in favor of the appellant regarding duty liability on scrap generated during maintenance and repair work. As no new evidence was presented to warrant re-adjudication of the issue for a different period, the impugned order confirming duty demand and interest was set aside, granting consequential benefit to the appellant. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75201 The appeal succeeded as the Tribunal found no justification to deviate from a prior decision ruling in favor of the appellant regarding duty liability on scrap generated during maintenance and repair work. As no new evidence was presented to warrant re-adjudication of the issue for a different period, the impugned order confirming duty demand and interest was set aside, granting consequential benefit to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75201