<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 89 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75190</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for outward transportation from the place of removal raised questions on the scope of &quot;input service&quot;, the effect of a Larger Bench ruling, and the amendment to Rule 2(l)(ii) effective from 1 April 2008. The applicability of credit depended on the factual position in each appeal, while it was contended that allowing credit was not equivalent to granting an exemption. Consideration was adjourned pending determination of the department&#039;s stay petition before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 89 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75190</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for outward transportation from the place of removal raised questions on the scope of &quot;input service&quot;, the effect of a Larger Bench ruling, and the amendment to Rule 2(l)(ii) effective from 1 April 2008. The applicability of credit depended on the factual position in each appeal, while it was contended that allowing credit was not equivalent to granting an exemption. Consideration was adjourned pending determination of the department&#039;s stay petition before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>