<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75182</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit order from Rs. 2 crores to a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lakhs due to the petitioner&#039;s financial hardship. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was at risk of dismissal for failure to deposit the amount. The Court considered the company&#039;s viability as a going concern and aimed to prevent undue financial burden that could affect production and employment. Emphasizing the need to balance legal requirements with business practicalities, the modification allowed the appeal to proceed if the bank guarantee was furnished within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75182</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit order from Rs. 2 crores to a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lakhs due to the petitioner&#039;s financial hardship. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was at risk of dismissal for failure to deposit the amount. The Court considered the company&#039;s viability as a going concern and aimed to prevent undue financial burden that could affect production and employment. Emphasizing the need to balance legal requirements with business practicalities, the modification allowed the appeal to proceed if the bank guarantee was furnished within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>