<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 164 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75172</link>
    <description>In a service tax dispute, the Tribunal waived the balance pre-deposit where the assessee had already paid a substantial part of the tax and interest before the show cause notice. It held, prima facie, that the extended limitation period was not sustainable because the record showed bona fide doubt on liability and no material of suppression, misstatement, fraud, collusion, or intent to evade duty. The demand was therefore treated as prima facie time-barred for pre-deposit purposes, and the remaining deposit was dispensed with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 164 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75172</link>
      <description>In a service tax dispute, the Tribunal waived the balance pre-deposit where the assessee had already paid a substantial part of the tax and interest before the show cause notice. It held, prima facie, that the extended limitation period was not sustainable because the record showed bona fide doubt on liability and no material of suppression, misstatement, fraud, collusion, or intent to evade duty. The demand was therefore treated as prima facie time-barred for pre-deposit purposes, and the remaining deposit was dispensed with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>